In spring, there was a gravel bike lying around in the Bikeboard office. It was actually "just for photography" to embellish the already published product presentation a bit.
But honestly: Isn't a bike, regardless of the price tag attached, always too good to just let it sit around? So out of the office with it, set up and, as Rose puts it: Let's get started!
Just a quick reminder and summary before we continue: The Blend is a new entry-level bike from Rose, available either with a gravel setup (€1,399) or in road trim (€1,199).
Let's get started
Rose BlendCan an entry-level bike at a nice price keep up with significantly more expensive models?
Short spoiler: It can!Frame
The aluminum frame of the Blend comes with a pleasing salmon pink paint job (alternatively, there's also matte black) with black-and-white dotted carbon fork. Notable are the cleanly ground weld seams, which only reveal the frame as a non-carbon model upon a second look.
The components and wheels come from in-house production. Shifting and braking are handled by Shimano's entry-level gravel group, GRX 400.
Visually, the cockpit appears very clean with the cables disappearing into the frame. Additionally, there are thru-axles at the front and rear, as well as the UDH standard on the derailleur hanger – all like the big ... uh, expensive ones.
There are drillings for in-house mudguards, as well as cable passages for a hub dynamo-driven lighting system. On the rear frame, there is also a mounting option for a kickstand. However, there are no drillings for a rack – probably to avoid competing with the Backroad AL and thus preventing the Blend from becoming an all-rounder wool-milk monster.
Even with the tire clearance of only 40 mm, the Blend leaves some potential untapped; however, for the beginner's range, this size is ultimately sufficient.
Smart components such as for mounting a mobile phone holder in the ahead cap are optionally available.
So far, so good. Only one question remains: Will the Rose confirm its positive visual impression also in operation? Can an entry-level bike at a nice price keep up with significantly more expensive models? Short spoiler: It can!
The frame is rather too large for my body size, but still well adjustable and rideable. There should be something for everyone from the Bocholters, as there are an impressive seven frame sizes to choose from.
A few spacers had to come out, which - by the way – despite the integrated cable routing went quickly and without complication.
The brake levers, which are somewhat clumsier compared to the top group, feel good in the hand and harmoniously fit with the handlebars set outwards by 5 degrees. Although I would prefer the handlebars to be a bit wider for a frame of this size, but that is nitpicking at a high level.
After the first ride, the Selle Italia saddle had to be replaced, as it was absolutely not compatible with my rear end.
Geometry
 | XXS | XS | S | M | L | XL | XXL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seat Tube (mm) | 425 | 460 | 490 | 520 | 550 | 580 | 600 |
Top Tube (mm) | 502 | 518 | 538 | 558 | 575 | 595 | 607 |
Head Angle (°) | 69.5° | 70° | 71° | 71.5° | 71.5° | 71.5° | 72° |
Seat Tube Angle (°) | 75° | 74.5° | 74° | 73.5° | 73.5° | 73° | 73° |
Chain Stay (mm) | 435 | 435 | 435 | 435 | 435 | 435 | 435 |
Bottom Bracket Drop (mm) | 75 | 75 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 70 | 70 |
Head Tube (mm) | 105 | 125 | 150 | 170 | 186 | 205 | 215 |
Fork Length (mm) | 402 | 402 | 402 | 402 | 402 | 402 | 402 |
Fork Offset (mm) | 47 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 47 |
Wheelbase (mm) | 1010 | 1017 | 1025 | 1035 | 1053 | 1069 | 1075 |
Stack (mm) | 532 | 552 | 577 | 598 | 613 | 629 | 640 |
Reach (mm) | 360 | 365 | 373 | 381 | 394 | 403 | 411 |
Tech Specs
Frame | Rose Blend, Aluminum, internal gear/brake cables | Brake | Shimano GRX RX400, 160/160 mm |
Sizes | XXS/XS/S/M/ML/L/XL | Crankset | Shimano GRX FD-RX600, 46/30 teeth, 172.5 mm |
Fork | Rose Blend, Carbon, internal brake line, 28"/700C | Chain | Shimano CN-HG54, 10-speed |
Wheels | Rose G20, 28" | Cassette | Shimano HG 500-10, 11-34 teeth |
Seatpost | Rose SP-DC1, 27.2 mm, 350 mm | Tires | Continental Terra Trail, 700x40C |
Saddle | Selle Italia Model X Superflow | Handlebar/Stem | Ritchey Road Comp Butano II, 42 cm/Rose ALR 90 mm |
Rear Derailleur | Shimano GRX RD-RX400, 10-speed | Weight | 10.3 kg (BB measurement) |
Shift/Brake Lever | Shimano GRX 10-speed | Price | € 1,399 (RRP) |
On the rocky road
Now nothing stood in the way of gravel fun. Suitable ideal terrain is plentiful in the primary test area, the Steinfeld around Wiener Neustadt.
I quickly realized that the aluminum frame, of course, did not have the damping properties of a carbon fiber model, but it was by no means uncomfortable flying over the gravel paths. However, when the gravel became somewhat deeper, it started to bounce like the proverbial lively goat. Only a higher speed brought calm back to the system.
On gravel, the Continental tires also reached their limits a bit. These could be expanded with a bit less air pressure, but for that, I would switch to tubeless. For statisticians and tinkerers: I had something between 3 and 3.5 bar in the tires to be able to roll reasonably well on asphalt too.
On forest floors and trails, the Blend did not show any weaknesses, was easy to maneuver, and was relatively unimpressed by roots.
The Blend showed no weaknesses
In the forest, on the road, uphill, downhill. Only deep gravel revealed some limitsAdmittedly, I was surprised by the performance of the gears and the brakes. I've always had a bit of a struggle with Shimano's entry-level groups - something would start rattling quickly; a creak here, a scrape there.
Initially, the scraping of the brake was also noticeable on the Blend, but once it was broken in, all was quiet. The gears themselves were challenged by the dusty and muddy conditions of the early autumn summer, but performed their duties without major issues. The slight shifting delay in the middle gears could be eliminated by increasing the cable tension a bit.
Sure, it's not a Di2. But what can you expect from a complete bike that costs less than the electronic shifting group alone.
Climbing uphill, the Blend performed flawlessly. For me, due to the frame size, the lower grip position was the most comfortable, but even in a standing position, optimally chosen dimensions would provide enough freedom for the thighs.
The range of the 2x10 drivetrain was sufficient to handle medium inclines with a few tougher sections well. You won't become a climbing king with it, but that's not the goal for a drop bar beginner.
Descending, the Blend also showed no weaknesses. On asphalt, the 40 mm wide tires precisely navigate through curves. For tighter direction changes, both on and off-road, a bit more leaning is occasionally needed due to the longer wheelbase.
When the speed increases, neither the wheels nor the frame start to flutter. Noteworthy are the 160 mm large brake discs, which ensure good brake modulation – a rarity for a beginner! Whether there is quicker fading on longer descents compared to top groups I cannot say, as there was no long mountain descent planned during the review period.
Conclusion
Rose Blend Gravel | |
---|---|
Model Year: | 2024 |
Review Duration: | 2 Months |
Price: | € 1,399,- RRP |
+ | Concept and execution |
+ | High-quality appearance |
+ | Gear and brake performance |
+ | Solid riding characteristics |
o | Tuning potential in wheels, tires, possibly carbon seatpost |
- | No rack mounts |
BB-Verdict: | Price-performance king for the moderate |
To conclude: Who is the Rose Blend Gravel intended for or suitable for?
Due to its price, it targets beginners primarily. Equipped with a kickstand and fenders, some commuters might also feel addressed - although they might miss the luggage rack. Bikepacking fans will definitely miss the same. For them, the only option is the Backroad series.
Looking briefly at the model variant with narrow tires, there is a balanced almost-endurance road bike suitable for hilly terrain, but with absolutely no racing genes.
Anyone looking for a bike for a fun, varied ride in the neighborhood will find what they need with the Blend and receive a coherent package with a stylish frame, a comfortable, not too sporty stretched gravel geometry, and very good equipment with optional enhancements at an almost unbeatable price-performance ratio.
What might one wish for the Blend? A bit more tire clearance to have more options off-road. The option to mount a rack to facilitate commuting or light bikepacking tours.
For tuners or beginners who want more over time, a lighter wheelset could reduce rolling mass from the 10 kg total weight. And for slightly higher comfort, a carbon seatpost comes to mind spontaneously, which could provide maximum damping for a reasonable price.