Trek Fuel EX 9.8 XT Di2 Gen 7 2026 — Review
09.03.26 07:09 1582026-03-09T07:09:00+01:00Text: NR22, NoMan (translated by AI)Photos: Erwin HaidenOne frame, three bikes. And we were out riding the most balanced of them. Impressions from our test rides with Trek's new heavyweight in terms of modularity, ridden on the trail-bike version with 150 mm of travel.09.03.26 07:09 5562026-03-09T07:09:00+01:00Trek Fuel EX 9.8 XT Di2 Gen 7 2026 — Review
09.03.26 07:09 5562026-03-09T07:09:00+01:00 NR22, NoMan (translated by AI) Erwin HaidenOne frame, three bikes. And we were out riding the most balanced of them. Impressions from our test rides with Trek's new heavyweight in terms of modularity, ridden on the trail-bike version with 150 mm of travel.09.03.26 07:09 5562026-03-09T07:09:00+01:00Last summer Trek gave cause for delight: the days of the dreadful tangle of bars were numbered! With the announcement that the trail-bike classic Fuel EX would be carried into its seventh generation, the Americans also returned to the familiar, straight designs and lines of the generations before 2023.
At first glance it was therefore clear that the MY26 (once again) had to be a completely redesigned frame. And indeed, what has since simply been called "Fuel" turned out to be more than just refreshed.
A specimen of this, according to Trek "ultimate trail bike", spent the winter at Bikeboard and in doing so… yes, let's be honest: it didn't rack up anywhere near as many kilometers as we had hoped. First there was the great end-of-season tiredness, then a training course that seamlessly turned into a full-blown flu, then suddenly Christmas with all its social obligations, and finally a deep, cold winter that buried all the trails for weeks under a stubborn layer of ice.
But now it was time to finish what had begun in late autumn 2025. Our findings are below. First, however, the most important points about Gen7 at a glance:
Three souls dwell, cool, in his chest
The new Trek Fuel follows in Faust's footstepsModularity is key
While the predecessor already relied — not least because it was also intended to replace the discontinued Remedy — on numerous adjustment options to tailor the bike individually, Trek went a step further for 2026. Through different link linkages and a replaceable lower shock mount with a flip chip for further adaptation to the rider profile, the same frame can be ridden in three basic configurations without having to compromise on frame geometry or progression:
- Fuel EX: 150 mm front/145 mm rear. Classic 29" setup for maximum efficiency on trails.
- Fuel MX: 160 mm front/150 mm rear. Mullet setup (29"/27.5" rear) for agility and freedom of movement.
- Fuel LX: 170 mm front/160 mm rear. Twentyniner with reserves for bike park and technical terrain.
Additionally, the headset in the new Zero-Stack standard allows the installation of angle-adjustable headset cups, so the front end can be ridden one degree steeper or slacker depending on personal preference, without affecting bottom bracket height. Unlike recently, you are no longer limited to Trek's proprietary solutions here and can, for example, also bring color into the aftermarket game.
The classic MinoLink, as it was known before, is, however, history.
Technical specifications
| Frame: | OCLV Mountain Carbon, adjustable leverage ratio, replaceable aluminum rocker arm, replaceable lower shock mount, downtube protector, Shuttle protector, BSA 73, ISCG 05, ABP, UDH, Boost148, adjustable travel 145-160 mm | Seatpost: | Bontrager Line Dropper, 150/170/200 mm travel, MaxFlow, internal cable routing, 34.9 mm |
| Sizes: | S/M/L/XL/XXL | Chain: | Shimano Ultegra/XT M8100 |
| Drivetrain: | Shimano XT Di2 M8250, 12-speed | Wheels: | Bontrager Line Comp 30, TLR, 6-bolt, 110x15 mm thru-axle, 29" (front), 27.5" (rear) |
| Rear tire: | Maxxis Minion DHR II, TLR, 3C, EXO+ casing, MAXXTERRA, 27.5 x 2.50 | Front tire: | Maxxis Minion DHF, TLR, 3C, EXO+ casing, MAXXGRIP, 29 x 2.50 |
| Brake: | Shimano XT M8220 hydraulic 4-piston disc brake, 203/180 mm | Headset: | ZS headset |
| Fork: | FOX Factory 36, Float EVOL air spring, GRIP X2 damping, 44 mm offset, Boost110, 15 mm Kabolt X axle, 150 mm travel | Stem: | Bontrager Elite, 35 mm, 0 degrees, 45 mm length |
| Shock: | FOX Factory Float X, 205 x 60 mm Travel Size S: 150 mm / Size M-XXL: 145 mm | Grips: | Trek Line Elite, screw clamp (lock-on) |
| Crank: | Shimano XT M8200, 30 T., 55 mm chainline, 170 mm crankarm length | Saddle: | Verse Short Pro, carbon rails, 145 mm width |
| Handlebar: | Race Face ERA, carbon, 35 mm, 27.5 mm rise, 800 mm width | Cassette: | Shimano XT M8200, 10-51 T., 12-speed |
| Shift levers: | Shimano XT Di2 M8250, 12-speed | Weight: | 14.75 kg (BB scale w/o pedals) |
| Rear derailleur: | Shimano XT M8250, long cage | Price: | € 6,999 RRP |
Trail-ready
Furthermore, the new edition has once again been optimized for modern trail use — and not only through more travel and a revised down tube and a beefy chainstay protector, or the proven Active Braking Pivot, which prevents the suspension from stiffening when braking.
The seat tube has been shortened again, but more importantly straightened, allowing long-travel dropper posts to be used. This also creates more space in the front triangle for, for example, a large water bottle or accessories like a mini pump or tool, for which there are also mounting points on the top tube.
There is, in any case, a dedicated, now even larger storage compartment in the down tube for such equipment. Both the aluminum and carbon frames are equipped with this storage compartment along with two (!) soft tool bags for the noiseless stowing of the items.
The reach has grown by around 10 mm — in size L to, for example, 482 mm. With longer head tubes the stack is also higher in the larger sizes, which helps prevent the sensation of flipping over on steep downhills. The chainstays, meanwhile, have grown too and range between 437 and 452 mm.
Speaking of sizes: Trek has slimmed down its fine seven-part size progression — presumably for cost reasons. XS and M/L are now omitted. While fans of the 18" intermediate size are still well served thanks to low standover heights and short seat tubes, people under 155 cm in height will now definitely have to look for a different bike.
Geometry
| Frame size | 15.5" S | 17.5" M | 19.5" L | 21.5" XL | 23" XXL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel size | 29"/27.5" | 29"/27.5" | 29"/27.5" | 29"/27.5" | 29"/27.5" |
| Seat tube length (mm) | 370 | 400 | 420 | 455 | 475 |
| Seat tube angle (°) | 72.3 | 72.3 | 72.3 | 72.3 | 72.3 |
| Effective seat tube angle (°) | 78.3 | 77.5 | 77.0 | 76.6 | 76.1 |
| Head tube length (mm) | 95 | 110 | 125 | 140 | 155 |
| Head angle (°) | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 |
| Top tube length - horizontal (mm) | 549 | 584 | 618 | 652 | 682 |
| Bottom bracket drop (mm) | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Chainstay length (mm) | 434 | 434 | 439 | 444 | 449 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 1,191 | 1,228 | 1,264 | 1,301 | 1,332 |
| Standover height (mm) | 745 | 747 | 754 | 760 | 769 |
| Reach (mm) | 426 | 456 | 482 | 507 | 527 |
| Stack (mm) | 613 | 627 | 641 | 654 | 668 |
| Bottom bracket height (mm) | 34.3 | 34.3 | 34.3 | 34.3 | 34.3 |
The devil is in the details
The concept of allowing different travel and rear-wheel sizes is basically very smart; however, you still can't buy every combination off the shelf. The LX version with 160 mm of travel (with a longer shock stroke) and the EX with 145 mm at the rear are only available with a 29" rear wheel. The MX variant with 150 mm is only offered with 27.5".All variants can later be converted between 29" and 27.5" using the lower shock mount, although you have to observe certain combinations of linkages and wheel sizes. If you use an MX rocker link with a longer 65 mm shock stroke (Fox air models can be internally converted), the travel changes to 163 mm. The different rocker links for EX, MX and LX are available separately.
There is one further exception, and it concerns our review bike of all things: the Fuel EX in size S actually has an MX rocker link with 150 mm of travel and a 27.5" rear wheel for a better fit (a conversion to 29" is possible).
So, because it combines the rear suspension of an MX with the geometry of an EX and is therefore the only model in the entire Fuel line to deviate from the norm, we discuss the exception below. But rider heights and review availability aren't something you can just pick …
As always, Trek's colorway is really nice to look at. The carbon model here, with its Gloss Dark Carmine/Matte Trek Black finish, comes across as almost understated. Considerably more lively and (still) beautiful are the two other OCLV options in Gloss Chameleon Green/Matte Black and Purple Phaze/Amethyst Marble.
Generally a bit more restrained, yet nonetheless super-stylish, are the three color variants of the aluminum counterpart in shades of red, gray and green.
The review bike is equipped, in addition to Fox suspension (Factory 36 Float EVOL/Factory Float X) and Maxxis Minion tires with EXO+ casing and Grip (front) / Terra (rear) compound, with an electronic Shimano XT groupset and a four-piston brake from the same maker, whose rotors are 203 and 180 mm.
For in-house components, Trek uses Bontrager wheels (Bontrager Line Comp 30), the dropper post (Bontrager Line Dropper), as well as the saddle (Verse Pro) and stem (Bontrager Elite).
Off into the greenery - uphill
The seventh generation of the Trek Fuel is not a lightweight trail bike - at least not with the equipment package of our 9.8 Di2 model.
Fat tires and sturdy wheels push the weight of our small review bike with a 27.5" rear wheel (instead of the 29er of the other sizes, which would be even heavier) up to 14.75 kg. With pedals you crack the 15-kg mark. Oof!
In combination with the softest tire compound at the front, the EX's acceleration potential is therefore naturally limited.
The weight becomes noticeable on long climbs and especially in steeper sections, of course; so you shouldn't expect record times uphill.
In these situations you can't help but feel more like you're on an enduro than a trail bike. Especially on paved sections it feels as if you're pedaling through a stream of honey. A condition that, fortunately, is not as noticeable off-road.
If climbing ability is particularly important to you or you want to spare yourself a few beads of sweat on the way to a remote summit, switching to lighter tires with lower rolling resistance can certainly get a lot out of the EX - but you'll then almost certainly have to accept compromises on the descent.
By contrast, there is a refined suspension setup that makes suspension bobbing while climbing practically imperceptible at moderate speeds. Only when you pedal hard does the suspension bob along slightly, but even that isn't really bothersome. A reach to the easily accessible platform lever on the shock optionally brings total calm to the suspension.
If you simply let the shock work open while climbing, you're rewarded with top-level sensitivity. The pedaling flow is still not negatively affected. Even larger obstacles can be rolled over undisturbed under chain tension.
The smallest frame size has, at 78.7 degrees, by far the steepest effective seat angle—and we appreciate this highly efficient pedaling position.
Personally, we'd also like to see a similar angle for the larger frame sizes. But because the actual seat angle is identical across all sizes, the effective angle gradually flattens out—on the XXL it drops to a not-quite up-to-date 76.4 degrees.
Due to the very short chainstays of the size-S and M frames, these variants rear up earlier than the best-in-class in very punchy steep sections. With larger frame sizes and their longer chainstays, the front wheel should stay on the ground longer.
Across all model sizes, 170 mm cranks are fitted. However, especially on the smaller frames we would have hoped for shorter crankarms. Once you get used to the increased ground clearance, it's hard to warm to longer cranks again. Aside from that, there are now more than enough studies showing that even for taller riders no functional advantages are to be found in longer cranks.
Excellent traction, controlled shock absorption
Trek's experience with suspension design is evidentDown
Behind Trek's suspension concept lies decades of experience. Accordingly, the seventh generation of the Trek Fuel feels refined in this regard. The leverage ratio of the Fuel describes a harmonious, almost straight-line curve. This allows the shock to do its work without unwanted interference.
On the trail this translates into excellent traction and controlled absorption characteristics. The 150 mm of travel from the MX rocker on the size S EX also feel potent in rough terrain — especially in the more linear progression setting, which underlines the bike's plush character. In this position it has proven useful to slow the compression by one to two extra clicks.
The progression adjustment at the lower shock mount is noticeable in the way the bike rides. On jumps and drops the more progressive setting pays off with increased bottom-out protection. It's only an assumption, but from experience the EX's 5 mm reduced travel (so 145 mm) should feel similar on frames from size M up, thanks to the larger wheel's better rollover ability.
By the way, the main pivot of the swingarm sits slightly in front of the bottom bracket, which produces a wheel-rise curve with a slightly larger radius. Its position above the chainring additionally directs the path into a somewhat more rearward-sloping curve. We're not talking the degree of a high-pivot bike here, but it contributes to the Fuel's rounded suspension behavior.
The chainstays grow with the Fuel's frame size, but they are on the short side relative to the frame. The most balanced in this scenario is our size S model, where the chainstays at 437 mm are even slightly longer than the short 431 mm reach. From the next frame size the jumps increase noticeably though (M: also 437 mm chainstay with 460 mm reach), so one can assume the bike's balance already shifts toward the rear wheel from that size and you should probably shift a bit more pressure onto the bars when riding.
Naturally, the smallest frame size is a nimble corner carver. The aggressive tires with a soft rubber compound willingly bite into the ground. For high control and safety, the pressure is distributed evenly across both tires.
At higher speeds, the short chainstays and short wheelbase inherently provide less rolling stability than the longer frame sizes. The 64.6-degree head angle can nowadays be seen as an all-round friendly middle ground for a trail bike. Anyone who wants to tune the bike toward additional stability (or a more agile steering feel) can vary it by +/- 1 degree using angle-adjustable headset cups.
Because the seat tube lengths of the Fuel are generally very short with a deep insertion, even smaller riders should have the option, if needed, to choose a larger frame size. With the remaining five frame sizes, a very wide spectrum is still covered.
The standover height is low, so there is correspondingly plenty of room to move. The telescopic seatpost with 150 mm of drop on the size-S frame, however, seems conservatively chosen. Even very small riders will be able to fit posts with more drop.
Where does the Fuel EX feel most at home? Tight singletracks and flow trails? Absolutely. Flow trails with jumps? Definitely. Technical root- and rock-strewn trails along with the occasional bike-park outing? Actually no problem either.
If the grippy, wide tires are more of a hindrance than a help on the climb, they significantly broaden the bike’s descending capabilities. Since the equipment and weight of the EX and MX are practically identical, the MX version with 160 mm of travel at the front definitely makes more sense for downhill-hungry riders than the EX.
From twisty singletracks and flow trails with jumps to occasional bike-park outings: no problem at all
Where is the EX most at home?Components review
Shimano's latest version of the XT Di2 groupset delivers the cleanest shifts. We had to set the pads on the shift lever to the most extreme positions to create enough room for the thumb.
On harder landings and bigger impacts you can occasionally hear some chain slap. The derailleur's return spring could therefore use a bit more tension.
Above all, the brakes are convincing. Finally, the XT's brake lever wandering seems to be a thing of the past. The high braking power is always available and, as usual, easy to modulate.
Bontrager's Line Comp 30 wheels aren't lightweight, but during the review period they didn't get any dents and otherwise held their spoke tension.
Conclusion
| Trek Fuel EX 9.8 XT Di2 Gen 7 | |
|---|---|
| Model year: | 2026 |
| Review duration: | 2 months |
| Price: | € 6,999 RRP |
| + | Refined suspension |
| + | Multiple travel options |
| + | 27.5" or 29" rear wheel |
| + | Adjustable head angle |
| + | Downhill-oriented character |
| - | Weight |
| - | Tires not the best choice for climbing |
| BB verdict: | Downhill-biased trail bike |
The concept of a frame platform with different travel options and adjustable suspension characteristics is good and recommended: Prefer a larger rear wheel instead of the small one? Prefer a bit more travel than originally thought? Prefer a more progressive setup? All possible, with little to no additional cost.
The EX in its base configuration definitely leans toward downhill. On the one hand this is due to the overall weight, on the other hand due to the choice of tires, which provide maximum traction but also bring maximum rolling resistance. A tire change could significantly ease progress uphill, to tune the Fuel more toward climbing potential and extended tours — because the suspension would definitely allow this all-round capability.
This downside automatically turns into an advantage when the trail points downhill. Even in the version with less travel the bike does not shy away from technical downhills and finds its line confidently even on rough terrain — while offering high fun potential in corners and the like.
| Modularity is key |
| Technical specifications |
| Trail-ready |
| Geometry |
| The devil is in the details |
| Off into the greenery - uphill |
| Down |
| Components review |
| Conclusion |
| Links |







